Rupture, Thou Art Upon Us?
What follows is strictly my opinion, nothing more. It is not what I want to see happen or hope will happen. But, I do feel like a rupture is drawing near if some things are not cleared up. The building storm in the SBC is going to sweep a lot of people with it, in my opinion. MSNBC has picked up on the Klouda Incident. We continue to have the IMB issues hanging over our heads. Marty Duren warns of a Great Divide that threatens to shatter the SBC into many different groups of traditionalists and reformers. We have declining baptisms and financial mismanagement or waste in our entities (see NAMB fiasco - actually all of our agencies are guilty of waste in one form or another). Trust is being lost amongst rank and file baptists and we are wondering how far this will all go.
Lately, I've been reading people say that those who are bringing up problems are the ones causing division. They are singing the song, "Can't we all just get along?" Dr. Malcolm Yarnell asks this of David Rogers, the son of Adrian Rogers and IMB missionary to Spain on David's blog. An anonymous commenter on Wade Burleson's blog says that
The Klouda case has split the conservatives in the SBC. Sherri Klouda being hired under Ken Hemphill (former president of Southwestern) who by all means is a conservative and now being forced out by Paige Patterson who claims to be a conservative. Now it appears that SBC'ers are going to be chosing sides - Ken Hemphill or Paige Patterson. ISN'T THE DEVIL HAVING A GREAT TIME?
"Isn't the Devil having a great time?" Where was that argument when missionaries were denied service because they spoke in tongues or were baptized in another denomination? When Sheri Klouda was fired from a teaching position at Southwestern teaching HEBREW just because she is a woman? (My Hebrew teacher at GGBTS was a woman and she was wonderful. She did not have spiritual authority over me in the church, but she taught me a skill that I much appreciated.) Where was that argument when NAMB wasted millions of dollars on frivolous expenditures all in the name of "promoting the gospel?" When a healthy church slips into decline because it cannot get it's focus off of itself and it's own desires? When we are focused on every little thing in the world instead of Jesus and the living out and proclamation of the Gospel? I guess that argument can go both ways, depending on how you look at it.
As the debate over the future of the SBC continues, many are lashing back at the reformers by saying that they are messing things up for everyone else by bringing up problems. The expectation is that everyone should accept every decision made by those in authority without question, whether we feel it is Biblical or not. The idea that each of us are to go to Scripture and read it for ourselves is giving way to a papist demand for conformity in all things, primary or secondary. During the Conservative Resurgence, all tactics seemed to be fair game and many reputations were ruined, but even principled dissent now is seen as out of bounds. Defenders of the status quo are saying that dissent should now be taken through proper channels and protesters should "work within the system," so that those in power can decide if they will respond to disagreement or not. I agree with working within the system, but it has been shown again and again that the "proper channels" tend to clog up a bit when requests are made that are not agreeable. Simply discussing issues that affect all of us on blogs is apparently no longer o.k. I guess it is better to plot a takeover in secret, like our current leaders did 30 years ago.
All in all, I do not see how this disagreement regarding the parameters of cooperation and the nature of dissent can end up positively in the SBC. There is a Missional Resurgence occurring and those of us who are taking part in it want to make sure that the SBC will be a place that we can do the work God has assigned us without worrying about constantly having to navigate through unneccessary obstacles. We want to make sure that we can ALL participate in global missions. We want our Cooperative Program money spent wisely and not wasted. We want our denominational agencies and entities to function correctly and to follow our statement of faith and their own operational by-laws. We want ALL Southern Baptists to be represented in decision making and not just a few. We hope that the SBC is large enough for cessationists and continualists, Calvinists and non-Calvinists, traditionalists and others, etc., etc. For this, we are called "political" and oppositional. We are told to be quiet and just enjoy the parade. We are told to give money, but do not ask for accountability.
Sigh. With all of these things going on, the biggest issue for me remains the IMB policies restricting missionary appointment because of private prayer language and baptism differences. Those issues directly relate to world missions and are most important to me in this whole thing. Much of this other stuff has been happening for a long time, and I never raised much of an eyebrow. I just kind of expected it. But, now that I am more aware, I am noticing the other things as well. I'm still waiting to see if participation in the ministry of the SBC is worth it in the long run. I'm not talking about withdrawing from the SBC, but rather, just not being personally involved with anything that goes on with it. Will there be a positive response in this conversation, or do we just need to take our energy and ideas elsewhere? Personally, I'm leaning toward the latter, but hope springs eternal, so I wait, watch, and listen. At the end of the day (and all throughout, actually), my hope is in Jesus Christ, because I know that the mission of God is much bigger than the SBC and anything that goes on amongst us. He remains on His throne and He continues to answer all who call upon Him. May He be glorified and the rest of this fade away.