The Road to San Antonio, Part 3: The Baptist Battle in the Blogosphere
Yesterday, an incredible battle broke loose in SBC life over the Lifeway Report on Speaking in Tongues that I reported on in my last post. I took part in quite a bit of it. I have said over and over again that I want to be out of all of this and I want my blog to be a place of edification and peace. Happily, I feel like that happened here at Downshoredrift, but it was not the case in other quarters of the blogosphere. According to the schedule that I laid out for my readers many months back, I have now stepped into my last phase of SBC blogging. If you are not interested in what I have to say about the SBC, please check back for other posts next week, or come back after the Convention June 11-13. For now, unfortunately, I am compelled to write about this, as I said I would, to finish the chronicling of a journey that began 18 months ago when I first began to oppose the actions of the IMB Board of Trustees.
If you had told me that I would be involved in SBC life in this way through writing, interest, going to a convention (or two), and even submitting a resolution, I would have laughed out loud. I am decidedly apolitical when it comes to things like this, and in my participation here, I have found that I am ill suited for the battle that has raged. I am consistently caught off guard by the machinations of people in the SBC who use one set of rules for Baptist life when it suits them and then switch the rules when it doesn't. I am going to say some harsh things here, but this is where I believe we are headed:
- I believe that the SBC is so broken into factions, at least by what is represented in the blogosphere and the upper echelons of power in our Convention, that we can no longer dialogue on anything substantial. I have found it completely useless to engage with some people in this debate as they can only accept what they want to and will not listen to other opinions, yet I keep trying hoping to get through or at least not let their accusations go unchallenged. However, we are now talking past each other, and actually have been for some time for no discernable purpose except to state our opinions. I look forward to this being over.
- When the Lifeway Research came out yesterday, there was a concerted effort by many to denigrate and call into question the integrity of the research and work of another Southern Baptist entity. Some are now saying that Ed Stetzer and people at Lifeway Research are biased and therefore implying that their results cannot be trusted. They did not say such a thing when Lifeway produced a study on Calvinism that said that only 10% of SB pastors were Calvinists, but they say it now. I don't want to assign motives to them, but with the number of posts churned out yesterday calling into question the veracity of the study's findings, it is clear that they are very worried about it's implications.
- Others have said that the sample size of 400 Southern Baptist pastors was too small to get an accurate reading, again calling into question the results. I am not great at math, but from my calculations, 400 is approximately 0.9% of 45,000 churches, if we assume that every Southern Baptist church has a pastor. To compare, most national political polls survey around 1000 people. If you consider that we generally have over 100 million people vote in our elections, that survey size is under 0.001%, and yet political polls come back with a margin of error of 3-5%. To say that the sample size is too small is simply not true.
- Over the past year and a half, we have consistently heard calls from the establishment to trust our leadership and to participate in SBC life. We did that through the Roundtable in Arlington in December led by Dwight McKissic and asked Lifeway, an SBC entity, to conduct this research. They did and answers came back that were not satisfactory for many on the opposing side. I truly believe that if the answers had come back more in the favor of those who are upset about this, there would be no questioning the results. None of them actually engaged the implications of the study, as it was easier to just attack the veracity of the study. Draw your own conclusions as to what that says about those in opposition.
- The SBC seems to now be headed for full blown civil war. Yesterday, I really hoped that the results of this study would show the people that I have opposed in this that there are many Southern Baptists who disagree with them and that we should have policies and guidelines that represent all Southern Baptists. Instead, it has raised their ire to a feverish pitch. I read people say that the problem with charismatic temptations are bigger than they ever thought and they began to hint that we should conduct other studies to understand exactly how widespread this is. The implication is that it should be addressed as aberrant theology.
- San Antonio promises to be very tense. The battle will rage through the resolutions as many, including myself, have submitted a resolution in the hope that the mood of the SBC will be captured and that a strong statement will be made. This could easily boil over and become a huge mess.
- What happens after that is beyond anyone's guess, but it is possible that things could only get much worse.
As I have said repeatedly, this would not be a problem if we would just respect one another and the differences that we have on tertiary issues. Unfortunately, some are now saying that this is not a tertiary issue. It still is for me, as I am fully willing to respect the position of cessationists and their full involvement in SBC life. I do not want to influence or force anyone to believe what I believe on this issue. I do not want to see anyone forced out of leadership or ministry over this issue. Lee Saunders, an emerging voice for balance and reason on this, echoes my sentiments exactly when he calls for peace, HERE. But, I am only fighting this because others are trying to eliminate from leadership people who hold the beliefs of approximately 50% of the SBC! I see that as an incredible injustice. Sadly however, if this keeps up, we will not have an SBC worth saving as the whole thing will splinter into a million different factions. Maybe that is what God has in mind, if in our pride we have built a tower and called attention to all that WE have done for "God's glory."
But, this battle, in the vast scheme of things really becomes quite stupid when you consider all those who do not know Christ and the battle that is really raging with the Enemy of our Souls. We all need to spend time in prayer and ask God to check our motives and our actions. We are still His servants and His glory, not our own, should be our main desire. I pray that that is what happens in San Antonio, but the road there has surely gotten quite bumpy and treacherous. Yes, I am praying for a miracle.
Very well said, Alan.
I was reading a Christianity Today article about Donald Miller - http://www.christianitytoday.com/45842 - just before I saw the Lifeway study and resulting blog “discussions.” They reminded me of something the Donald Miller article quoted from one of his books.
[quote] “My most recent faith struggle is not one of intellect. I don't really do that anymore. Sooner or later you just figure out there are some guys who don't believe in God and they can prove he doesn't exist, and some other guys who do believe in God and they can prove he does exist, and the argument stopped being about God a long time ago and now it's about who is smarter, and honestly I don't care.” [end quote]
I’m starting to wonder how much these discussions about PPL are really about Jesus, the Bible, and the Great Commission, and how much they are about the people who are arguing and who is smarter.
Alan, I believe you really are trying to understand and follow Jesus, the Bible, and the Great Commission. I am certain others are as well. What troubles me is that for many it appears the discussion “stopped being about God a long time ago.” Whether the appearance is reality or not, I do not know.
Posted by: Steve Walker | June 02, 2007 at 11:55 AM
Steve,
You're absolutely right - Miller is dead on. I'm going to keep writing these "Road to San Antonio" posts throughout the next week, and I am about to shift to the things that we (I) should be focusing on to chart a course for the future. My next post will be on why PPL is no big deal to me at all in the vast scheme of things because all that really matters is what I do with Jesus. Hang with me - I'm getting there, and in doing that, getting back to the point of what this is really supposed to be about.
Posted by: Alan Cross | June 02, 2007 at 01:48 PM
I hope all of this will focus irenic conservatives in prayer during the next 2 weeks for the SBC.
Posted by: Rob Slagle | June 02, 2007 at 05:01 PM
Alen
The SBC claims to be the world’s largest protestant denomination with some 16 million members and 45,000 churches. Yet it was reported that only 9,000 messengers representing 2,000 SBC churches were present at last year’s 2006 Southern Baptist Convention
Here are some statistics worth considering:
(2,000 / 45,000 = .0444%) That means that less than ½ of one percent of all Southern Baptist Churches were represented at last year’s convention… Ouch!
When you reverse that statement it becomes even clearer: Over 99.5 % of all Southern Baptist churches were not represented at last year’s convention… Again OUCH!
Regardless of how you run the numbers… it is a sad indictment on our claims of being a Democratic Convention, and for anything coming out of any convention as being a representation of the will of all Southern Baptist or what all Southern Baptist believe.
Grace to all,
Posted by: Greg Alford | June 02, 2007 at 09:24 PM
I don't think you are assigning motives at all, it was pretty obvious to me and I'm no rocket scientist. :) The rest of your points are key as well and very prophetic. I also have done with the figures what Greg did and came up with close to the same % not being represented at the Convention. I am praying for a miracle along with you Alan and have been for over a year. It may take a lot more exposing and possibly the temporary collapse of the SBC before we can rebuild and be what we should be.
Posted by: Debbie Kaufman | June 03, 2007 at 05:13 PM
Greg needs to do his math. 2,000 / 45,000 = 0.444 = 4.44% That means that 4.44 percent of SBC churches were represented at last year's convention. Even though that is better than 1/2 of one percent - I agree - it is a sad indictment to our "democratic" convention.
Posted by: Zack Zbinden | June 10, 2007 at 12:14 AM